FRANCES: ● A principled defense is needed (George Orwell was a socialist, FFS!)
Does FFS mean “for freakish swishing” — or something else [Fast Food Served?!!!] — or is the professor using profanity? [Never ask a question to which you don’t know the probable answer; or the outright lies; in anything remotely “legal”. KB]
Nobody in their right mind plays “defense” in anything remotely “legal”, given that the law presumes innocence. That means that nobody has to defend their innocence, which is presumed. Hence, a principled counter-attack and counter-prosecution is the only “principled” modus upon which one ought to proceed.
And hence, my usual question: Did your CAUT lawyers say anything about collusion in your latest 2 day “smear Frances” hearing???
FRANCES: ● A principled defense is needed (George Orwell was a socialist, FFS!)
Does FFS mean “for freakish swishing” — or something else [Fast Food Served?!!!] — or is the professor using profanity? [Never ask a question to which you don’t know the probable answer; or the outright lies; in anything remotely “legal”. KB]
Nobody in their right mind plays “defense” in anything remotely “legal”, given that the law presumes innocence. That means that nobody has to defend their innocence, which is presumed. Hence, a principled counter-attack and counter-prosecution is the only “principled” modus upon which one ought to proceed.
And hence, my usual question: Did your CAUT lawyers say anything about collusion in your latest 2 day “smear Frances” hearing???
Kevin