In Episode #9 (of Widdowson’s firing) and Essay #3 [of Background for the Arbitration of the #FrancesWiddowsonCase (January 16-27, 2023, Calgary, Alberta)] Widdowson proves that at least one lawyer was involved in her firing. Quote (from Essay #3):
On February 1st 2021, Frances Widdowson was found, by an outside investigator hired by Mount Royal University (MRU), to have engaged in harassment and discrimination because of one tweet. … [large snip detailing the tweet as a response, to a response, to a letter from an MRU faculty member, which implied that MRU had a “white supremacy culture” in its union] … It was also determined to constitute discrimination under the Alberta HUMAN RIGHTS ACT and harassment under Alberta’s OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH and SAFETY ACT. (because)
EPISODE #9 … the investigator stated that she had “mocked the Complainant’s identity”.
Describing Widdowson as “The Respondent” and citing 2 legal Acts, after corroborating some very few facts, means that the investigator was, almost certainly, a lawyer — hired by MRU’s administration.
Then, when one considers MRU’s administration and Widdowson’s article [Reaping Postmodernism’s Violent Whirlwind] in MINDING THE CAMPUS, Widdowson produces a 2nd lawyer, named Amy Nixon (of all things)! [Rhetorical Question: Are all Nixon-s suspicious sorts of lawyers? To be determined.] Nixon works at MRU and was part of “the gang” which tried to force “You’re Fired” papers upon Widdowson after she supervised her last MRU exam and without a Union Representative present.
There’s your colluding lawyers — (1) one so-called “investigator” and (2) an in-house “counsel”, who ignored all kinds of actual harassment of Widdowson, including others instigating student complaints against Frances, attempted intimidation of Widdowson’s publishers and frivolous, vexatious and libelous complaints against Widdowson from the likes of Renae Watchman.
And that’s a certainty about lawyers. Whatever one accuses their clients or friends of doing, or being, they will do almost their “damnedest” to “prove” exactly the same case against yourself. Widdowson is dealing with exactly the same kinds of lawyers that ran the physicist, Denis Rancourt, out of the University of Ottawa, as pointed out in her Whirlwind article.
MRU has less cause against Widdowson than Ottawa had against Rancourt. He actually did defame an Ottawa law professor when she dismissed a frivolous and vexatious “woke” complaint which Rancourt did not carefully study before describing Professor St. Lewis as a “House N-word” in a University supported public (radio?) broadcast. But the tactics of the U of Ottawa against Rancourt both before and after he “lost it” (on the side of woke students of so-called “color”) against law Professor Lewis (also a person of “color”) was bizarre and unconscionable. A spying student shadowed him and reported to the administration. A psychiatrist fabricated “psych-evidence” against him without ever consulting him or examining him. Soviet style tactics.
That’s another thing about lawyers — they don’t care about the truth. That is not their job. Their job is to cast so-called “reasonable doubts” on the truth from the other side of the case and to integrate true corroborated facts with statutes on their side of cases — which is exactly what the so-called “investigator” did against Widdowson. The “investigator” in Widdowson’s case, was the same sort of “hired gun” as the psychiatrist in Rancourt’s case. Allan Rock [lawyer and University president] was to the psychiatrist (in Rancourt’s case), what Amy Nixon [lawyer and secretary] was to the investigator (in Widdowson’s case). Colluders all.
Hence there is even more reason now for Frances Widdowson to cry both “foul” and COLLUSION in her arbitration. And there is a final bit of collusion in relation to this matter. Dr. Scott Hamilton of Lakehead University provided 2 lawyers named Wilton Littlechild and Murray Sinclair a report entitled WHERE ARE THE CHILDREN BURIED?, in 2015, before they concluded their Truth and Reconciliation Commission work. On page 15 of that Report, in wide open sight, you may read the first three so-called “discoveries” of unmarked graves, allegedly “discovered” a full six years after the locations of the unmarked graves were reported to Sinclair, Littlechild and Wilson.
Both Frances Widdowson and Hymie Rubenstein have been privy to Hamilton’s 2015 Report for ages, given Rubenstein’s first pair of C2C essays — which even shows a photo of Hamilton. Just go to page 15 of Hamilton’s Report at the Truth and Reconciliation Website under Reports. Quote
HAMILTON (p. 15):
within the town site, while the adjacent residential school was closed and demolished (Figure 18, 19, 20). At MARIEVAL IRS (on COWESESS First Nation, Saskatchewan) [N.B.*** The 2nd so-called “discovery” *** KB], the original school was demolished and replaced with a day school, but the church, rectory and CEMETERY remain (Figure 21, 22, 23, 24). St. Martin’s (Desmarais) Residential School at Wabasca Lake in northern Alberta was demolished upon school closure, but the hospital and cemetery grounds remain in operation (Figure 25). Similar refurbishment and reuse is evident at St. EUGENE’s IRS near CRANBROOK, BC (Figure 26). [N.B. *** The 3rd so-called “discovery” *** KB] In this case the old residential school was transformed into a hotel resort and cultural centre adjacent to a golf course. The school CEMETERY remains visible on land adjacent to the golf course fairways (Figure 26, 27), but it is not clear whether the CEMETERY remains in use. In the case of both Alberni and KAMLOOPS Indian Residential Schools, the property was taken over by a local First Nation, and the facilities continue to serve community functions. At Alberni IRS, the school grounds serve Band administrative functions, with the unmarked old school cemetery located behind the structures and parking lot (Figure 28) In the case of KAMLOOPS IRS [N.B. *** The first so-called “discovery” *** KB] , the facility was transformed into a cultural centre (Figure 29) Online research has not yet revealed the CEMETERY at the latter [i.e. Kamloops] school. Residential Schools often went through a succession of rebuilding episodes as older structures became too small, became unusable, were destroyed by fire, or became redundant and were re-established in a more suitable location. This could result in a school (often with the same name or administered by the same church) moving from one location to another. One example is the sequence of school operations that began at All Saints IRS at Lac La Ronge (Saskatchewan, 1907 to 1947), but was later moved to Prince Albert, Saskatchewan (1947 to 1996). The school name was changed from All Saints to Prince Albert IRS in 1953. The Prince Albert school also received students transferred from nearby St Albans IRS (1944-1951), which in turn had received students from St. Barnabas IRS at Onion Lake (1892-1943) upon its closure.
15
[Hamilton’s Footnotes to page 15]
20 https://www.aadnc aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100021303/1100100021310 accessed Jan 18, 2015.
21
Alex Maass, TRC Cemetery report for Alberni IRS. She cites an email communication from Mr. Porgeng of the B.C. Archaeology Branch dated April 13, 2012 to locate the cemetery immediately south of the Nuuchah-nulth Tribal Council Buildings.
22
Alex Maass, TRC Cemetery Report indicating that the original IRS is now the ‘Chief Louis Center’
operated by the Secwepemc Kamloops Indian Band.
23 http://www.anglican.ca/relationships/histories/all-saints-school-sk accessed Jan 18, 2015.
Where Hamilton says that, quote “Online research has not yet revealed the CEMETERY at the latter school.”, he is referring to Online Satellite images (as “Online research…”) obtained from Google Earth or other satellite imaging applications. And Hamilton may have mistakenly presumed there was a cemetery on the IRS school grounds simply because that was the case with most residential schools. A church, a cemetery, an infirmary and a school were often located in proximity to each other. But with Kamloops, their Church and arguable graveyard was built long before the Sucwepemc lobbied Ottawa for, and obtained, the residential school built on their reserve in 1890. So there may never have been an ultimately neglected cemetery at the Kamloops IRS, as was certainly the case with both Cowesess [bogus “discovery” #2] and St. Eugene’s [bogus “discovery” #3] at Cranbrook.
You cannot “discover” something about which you knew, 6 years before asserting its “discovery”. When Secwepemc (and other’s) “day school” suits began to “bog down” in the Federal Court of British Columbia, in 2021, the “discoveries” [which all 3 Truth and Reconciliation Commissioners had been informed of 6 years earlier in 2015] began. That is why someone called Murray Sinclair “in a panic” when the R.C.M.P. asked them about the “discoveries” and also why Murray Sinclair told the Kamloops-caller to “lawyer – up” against “ham-fisted” (or some such) police tactics, as reported on this very website.
Oh what a tangled web we weave when e’er we practice to deceive — deceit for big money which is also known as fraud.
It’s getting a little more difficult to find Hamilton’s Report given additional information at the NCTR website. The universal resource locator [URL] is:
In Episode #9 (of Widdowson’s firing) and Essay #3 [of Background for the Arbitration of the #FrancesWiddowsonCase (January 16-27, 2023, Calgary, Alberta)] Widdowson proves that at least one lawyer was involved in her firing. Quote (from Essay #3):
On February 1st 2021, Frances Widdowson was found, by an outside investigator hired by Mount Royal University (MRU), to have engaged in harassment and discrimination because of one tweet. … [large snip detailing the tweet as a response, to a response, to a letter from an MRU faculty member, which implied that MRU had a “white supremacy culture” in its union] … It was also determined to constitute discrimination under the Alberta HUMAN RIGHTS ACT and harassment under Alberta’s OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH and SAFETY ACT. (because)
EPISODE #9 … the investigator stated that she had “mocked the Complainant’s identity”.
Describing Widdowson as “The Respondent” and citing 2 legal Acts, after corroborating some very few facts, means that the investigator was, almost certainly, a lawyer — hired by MRU’s administration.
Then, when one considers MRU’s administration and Widdowson’s article [Reaping Postmodernism’s Violent Whirlwind] in MINDING THE CAMPUS, Widdowson produces a 2nd lawyer, named Amy Nixon (of all things)! [Rhetorical Question: Are all Nixon-s suspicious sorts of lawyers? To be determined.] Nixon works at MRU and was part of “the gang” which tried to force “You’re Fired” papers upon Widdowson after she supervised her last MRU exam and without a Union Representative present.
There’s your colluding lawyers — (1) one so-called “investigator” and (2) an in-house “counsel”, who ignored all kinds of actual harassment of Widdowson, including others instigating student complaints against Frances, attempted intimidation of Widdowson’s publishers and frivolous, vexatious and libelous complaints against Widdowson from the likes of Renae Watchman.
And that’s a certainty about lawyers. Whatever one accuses their clients or friends of doing, or being, they will do almost their “damnedest” to “prove” exactly the same case against yourself. Widdowson is dealing with exactly the same kinds of lawyers that ran the physicist, Denis Rancourt, out of the University of Ottawa, as pointed out in her Whirlwind article.
MRU has less cause against Widdowson than Ottawa had against Rancourt. He actually did defame an Ottawa law professor when she dismissed a frivolous and vexatious “woke” complaint which Rancourt did not carefully study before describing Professor St. Lewis as a “House N-word” in a University supported public (radio?) broadcast. But the tactics of the U of Ottawa against Rancourt both before and after he “lost it” (on the side of woke students of so-called “color”) against law Professor Lewis (also a person of “color”) was bizarre and unconscionable. A spying student shadowed him and reported to the administration. A psychiatrist fabricated “psych-evidence” against him without ever consulting him or examining him. Soviet style tactics.
That’s another thing about lawyers — they don’t care about the truth. That is not their job. Their job is to cast so-called “reasonable doubts” on the truth from the other side of the case and to integrate true corroborated facts with statutes on their side of cases — which is exactly what the so-called “investigator” did against Widdowson. The “investigator” in Widdowson’s case, was the same sort of “hired gun” as the psychiatrist in Rancourt’s case. Allan Rock [lawyer and University president] was to the psychiatrist (in Rancourt’s case), what Amy Nixon [lawyer and secretary] was to the investigator (in Widdowson’s case). Colluders all.
Hence there is even more reason now for Frances Widdowson to cry both “foul” and COLLUSION in her arbitration. And there is a final bit of collusion in relation to this matter. Dr. Scott Hamilton of Lakehead University provided 2 lawyers named Wilton Littlechild and Murray Sinclair a report entitled WHERE ARE THE CHILDREN BURIED?, in 2015, before they concluded their Truth and Reconciliation Commission work. On page 15 of that Report, in wide open sight, you may read the first three so-called “discoveries” of unmarked graves, allegedly “discovered” a full six years after the locations of the unmarked graves were reported to Sinclair, Littlechild and Wilson.
Both Frances Widdowson and Hymie Rubenstein have been privy to Hamilton’s 2015 Report for ages, given Rubenstein’s first pair of C2C essays — which even shows a photo of Hamilton. Just go to page 15 of Hamilton’s Report at the Truth and Reconciliation Website under Reports. Quote
HAMILTON (p. 15):
within the town site, while the adjacent residential school was closed and demolished (Figure 18, 19, 20). At MARIEVAL IRS (on COWESESS First Nation, Saskatchewan) [N.B.*** The 2nd so-called “discovery” *** KB], the original school was demolished and replaced with a day school, but the church, rectory and CEMETERY remain (Figure 21, 22, 23, 24). St. Martin’s (Desmarais) Residential School at Wabasca Lake in northern Alberta was demolished upon school closure, but the hospital and cemetery grounds remain in operation (Figure 25). Similar refurbishment and reuse is evident at St. EUGENE’s IRS near CRANBROOK, BC (Figure 26). [N.B. *** The 3rd so-called “discovery” *** KB] In this case the old residential school was transformed into a hotel resort and cultural centre adjacent to a golf course. The school CEMETERY remains visible on land adjacent to the golf course fairways (Figure 26, 27), but it is not clear whether the CEMETERY remains in use. In the case of both Alberni and KAMLOOPS Indian Residential Schools, the property was taken over by a local First Nation, and the facilities continue to serve community functions. At Alberni IRS, the school grounds serve Band administrative functions, with the unmarked old school cemetery located behind the structures and parking lot (Figure 28) In the case of KAMLOOPS IRS [N.B. *** The first so-called “discovery” *** KB] , the facility was transformed into a cultural centre (Figure 29) Online research has not yet revealed the CEMETERY at the latter [i.e. Kamloops] school. Residential Schools often went through a succession of rebuilding episodes as older structures became too small, became unusable, were destroyed by fire, or became redundant and were re-established in a more suitable location. This could result in a school (often with the same name or administered by the same church) moving from one location to another. One example is the sequence of school operations that began at All Saints IRS at Lac La Ronge (Saskatchewan, 1907 to 1947), but was later moved to Prince Albert, Saskatchewan (1947 to 1996). The school name was changed from All Saints to Prince Albert IRS in 1953. The Prince Albert school also received students transferred from nearby St Albans IRS (1944-1951), which in turn had received students from St. Barnabas IRS at Onion Lake (1892-1943) upon its closure.
15
[Hamilton’s Footnotes to page 15]
20
https://www.aadnc aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100021303/1100100021310 accessed Jan 18, 2015.
21
Alex Maass, TRC Cemetery report for Alberni IRS. She cites an email communication from Mr. Porgeng of the B.C. Archaeology Branch dated April 13, 2012 to locate the cemetery immediately south of the Nuuchah-nulth Tribal Council Buildings.
22
Alex Maass, TRC Cemetery Report indicating that the original IRS is now the ‘Chief Louis Center’
operated by the Secwepemc Kamloops Indian Band.
23
http://www.anglican.ca/relationships/histories/all-saints-school-sk accessed Jan 18, 2015.
Where Hamilton says that, quote “Online research has not yet revealed the CEMETERY at the latter school.”, he is referring to Online Satellite images (as “Online research…”) obtained from Google Earth or other satellite imaging applications. And Hamilton may have mistakenly presumed there was a cemetery on the IRS school grounds simply because that was the case with most residential schools. A church, a cemetery, an infirmary and a school were often located in proximity to each other. But with Kamloops, their Church and arguable graveyard was built long before the Sucwepemc lobbied Ottawa for, and obtained, the residential school built on their reserve in 1890. So there may never have been an ultimately neglected cemetery at the Kamloops IRS, as was certainly the case with both Cowesess [bogus “discovery” #2] and St. Eugene’s [bogus “discovery” #3] at Cranbrook.
You cannot “discover” something about which you knew, 6 years before asserting its “discovery”. When Secwepemc (and other’s) “day school” suits began to “bog down” in the Federal Court of British Columbia, in 2021, the “discoveries” [which all 3 Truth and Reconciliation Commissioners had been informed of 6 years earlier in 2015] began. That is why someone called Murray Sinclair “in a panic” when the R.C.M.P. asked them about the “discoveries” and also why Murray Sinclair told the Kamloops-caller to “lawyer – up” against “ham-fisted” (or some such) police tactics, as reported on this very website.
Oh what a tangled web we weave when e’er we practice to deceive — deceit for big money which is also known as fraud.
Kevin
It’s getting a little more difficult to find Hamilton’s Report given additional information at the NCTR website. The universal resource locator [URL] is:
https://nctr.ca/records/reports/#highlighted-reports