Dr. Westhues, this is an absolutely unjust situation. Intolerable in a democracy, how these academic star chambers can make or break careers. And this has affected the wider society at large, like a poison at the root of all academic processes.
Call it communism, or call it fascism, its two ends of the same horseshoe.
Sir, I would like to seek your comment on a related matter, but cannot find your email address. The issue is “gang stalking,” which is similar to work place mobbing, but takes place under the community policing rubric, what Jan-Paul Brodeur calls “high policing” or “political policing,” derivative of the British National Intelligence Model.
I think it is imperative on democracy that we connect this mobbing activity to community policing, because the latter version is far more brutal, and people actually get murdered in these scenarios.
There is a well-funded effort to discredit complainants of gang stalking, aka “targeted individuals,” and I think academic support for their victims is a good first step to bringing these cases to light.
That dialectic breaks down into two distinct groups, and so far few if anny other than myself and “targeted individuals” have made this distinction:
-victims of community policing, who are targeted, stalked, harassed, and sometimes murdered as we saw in the case of Ahmaud Arbery in Georgia, USA
-psychobabbling fruitcakes who ramble on about psychotronic weapons, satellites, and V2K–all of who are traceable online as current and former law enforcement, military, intelligence agents state workers, police union members and so on–the former NSA agent Karen Stewart is a prime example.
Sir–those who are targeted with these brutal online psychological operations (email hacking, constant internet redirection, internet and cell phone devices held hostage by Fusion Centers), and the more brutal offline community policing (cars run off the roads, accidents caused by vehicle mobbing, being shot at in their own front yards, gangs of community mobbers leering into their wndows at night, denial of basic services like food, electricity, etc.) have genuine complaints.
I am seeking academic support and alliance to bring these facts to light. Is it possible that I can seek your comment on the matter? Would you be willing to lend academic authority to such a cause?
Recently, after a ten-plus year battle with Wikipedia, there is a page about gang stalking, but predictably, it cites all of the well known disinformation authorities, such as Sheridan and James, or that Veterans Administration drug pusher, Dr. Joe Pierre, and other pro-prosecution “authorities.”
I sincerely respect your work on this topic, and have cited you in many discussions. I also am an admirer of your work at the Working Center as well. I think any credible statement that you make in this regard could be added to that discussion online, at that Wikipedia page. and elsewhere.
Currently, they are attempting to distinguish gang stalking from mobbing, with deleterious effects on those who are being mobbed and even murdered in their communities.
This is also insighful–citing mobbing “inmobiliario: Gutiérrez, 2008.” So many of these cases are real estate related, including the Portapique mass shooter, Gabriel Wortman. His case reds like a “police/RCMP pension fund” v. citizen case, its very transparent.
Dr. Westhues, this is an absolutely unjust situation. Intolerable in a democracy, how these academic star chambers can make or break careers. And this has affected the wider society at large, like a poison at the root of all academic processes.
Call it communism, or call it fascism, its two ends of the same horseshoe.
Sir, I would like to seek your comment on a related matter, but cannot find your email address. The issue is “gang stalking,” which is similar to work place mobbing, but takes place under the community policing rubric, what Jan-Paul Brodeur calls “high policing” or “political policing,” derivative of the British National Intelligence Model.
I think it is imperative on democracy that we connect this mobbing activity to community policing, because the latter version is far more brutal, and people actually get murdered in these scenarios.
There is a well-funded effort to discredit complainants of gang stalking, aka “targeted individuals,” and I think academic support for their victims is a good first step to bringing these cases to light.
That dialectic breaks down into two distinct groups, and so far few if anny other than myself and “targeted individuals” have made this distinction:
-victims of community policing, who are targeted, stalked, harassed, and sometimes murdered as we saw in the case of Ahmaud Arbery in Georgia, USA
-psychobabbling fruitcakes who ramble on about psychotronic weapons, satellites, and V2K–all of who are traceable online as current and former law enforcement, military, intelligence agents state workers, police union members and so on–the former NSA agent Karen Stewart is a prime example.
Sir–those who are targeted with these brutal online psychological operations (email hacking, constant internet redirection, internet and cell phone devices held hostage by Fusion Centers), and the more brutal offline community policing (cars run off the roads, accidents caused by vehicle mobbing, being shot at in their own front yards, gangs of community mobbers leering into their wndows at night, denial of basic services like food, electricity, etc.) have genuine complaints.
I am seeking academic support and alliance to bring these facts to light. Is it possible that I can seek your comment on the matter? Would you be willing to lend academic authority to such a cause?
Recently, after a ten-plus year battle with Wikipedia, there is a page about gang stalking, but predictably, it cites all of the well known disinformation authorities, such as Sheridan and James, or that Veterans Administration drug pusher, Dr. Joe Pierre, and other pro-prosecution “authorities.”
I sincerely respect your work on this topic, and have cited you in many discussions. I also am an admirer of your work at the Working Center as well. I think any credible statement that you make in this regard could be added to that discussion online, at that Wikipedia page. and elsewhere.
Currently, they are attempting to distinguish gang stalking from mobbing, with deleterious effects on those who are being mobbed and even murdered in their communities.
Any reply at all would be much appreciated!
This is also insighful–citing mobbing “inmobiliario: Gutiérrez, 2008.” So many of these cases are real estate related, including the Portapique mass shooter, Gabriel Wortman. His case reds like a “police/RCMP pension fund” v. citizen case, its very transparent.